Naturalistic ontology and epistemology of moral facts

The paper presents an original version of the moral naturalism — a theory that combines realism and naturalistic empiricism. In first section, I give initial definitions basic concepts for our study (such as realism, epistemological metaphysical naturalism, supervenience) clarify their meaning. second present main motivation this those grounds on which we should try to defend both naturalism. third take series steps aimed at explication logical form facts. advantage proposed is it allows us argue knowledge such facts can be result physical properties objects. This implies are compatible. fourth demonstrate another feature form: similar some other, much less controversial modal as, example, about possibilities). similarity propose kind analogy Armstrong’s combinatorial possibility Doing so show how supervene totality all fifth analyze most serious problem naturalism: Hume’s guillotine. sixth final argument make remarks.